Friday, March 4, 2011
KausFiles | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment
KausFiles | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment: "P.S.: That’s one of the problems with campaign finance laws: the categories are inherently slippery. Everything John Edwards did–every breath he took–for four years was designed to get him elected president, after all. His antipoverty work was designed to make him look good. The payoffs to Rielle Hunter were designed to make him look good (by preventing him from looking bad). If the latter is a campaign expense, and has to be paid for with funds subject to individual limits, why not the former? And don’t say it’s because the former is a good thing and the latter is a bad thing. Criminal law isn’t supposed to be a blanket warrant to punish things we think are bad. "
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment